French press: "It is expected that Turkey will mobilize the Fourth Army Corps and draw troops from Asia Minor in order to "suppress the uprising." That would be while Turkey is attacked from every direction, Germans who later worked with Hitler, were supervising movements and railways and France and Britain sits in negotiations over Palestine and Damascus!

"Armenian rebels"..1.5 million "rebels".."It is expected  that Turkey will mobilize," that would be while loosing hundreds of thousands people and while attacked and fighting in Iraq, Palestine, attacked by the British and French naval attacks and dying at the Caucasus borders to Russia!

August 22, 1939 - Hitler´s Obersalzberg Speech:

"Our strength is our quickness and our brutality. Genghis Khan had millions of women and children hunted down and killed, deliberately and with a gay heart. History sees in him only the great founder of States. What the weak Western European civilization alleges about me, does not matter. I have given the order – and will have everyone shot who utters but one word of criticism – that the aim of this war does not consist in reaching certain designated [geographical] lines, but in the enemies' physical elimination. Thus, for the time being only in the east, I put ready my Death's Head units, with the order to kill without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of the Polish race or language. Only thus will we gain the living space that we need. Who still talks nowadays of the extermination of the Armenians?"

"It is expected  that Turkey will mobilize."..Just like it is expected  that Turkey and the regime in Iran will suppress and ethnically clean Kurds and Iranians ever since. Like the outcome of the "Syrian uprising" is expected while militants or/and "rebels" goes shuffle traffic between the borders and the Kurdish, Iraqi, Palestinians genocides continues! 

This is just a continuing of crimes against humanity and searching for "rebels" world wide like it has been done for hundred of years!

The Treaty of Lausanne was not a coincident just as that it was not a coincident that Khomeini went from Turkey to Paris! Just as it´s no coincidences what happens in the region and beyond filled with "rebels" today! There are no #¤#¤¤ coincidences what so ever- it´s all staged for and just a continuing!

STATEMENT FROM KHOMEINI SPOKESMAN IN PARIS 1979

Iranian religious leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, remains at his house in Pontchartrain, near Paris. A spokesman for Khomeini talks to members of the press regarding Khomeini's plans. Iranian Foreign Minister Sadegh Ghotbzadeh gives an interview whilst on a visit to Paris on the situation in Iran. Then there was a Press conference in Tehran in the trials of former Khomeini ally Sadegh Ghotbzadeh and Shariatmadari, who advocated a secular state.

There are attacks, bombings, explosions, masskillings, destruction and exterminations in Gaza, Lebanon, Serêkaniyê, Syria, Iraq and all over the region in "the war on terrorism" - bullsh*ttalk! These are orchestrated, coordinated, intended attacks and full fledged genocides and those in the UN body knows it very #¤#¤¤ well!

Tel Halaf is on the opposite side of the border from the Ceylanpınar Agricultural Enterprise Directorate. Before it passed under YPG control it was one of the main crossing points from Turkey into Syria for the gangs.

11 killed in suicide bomb attacks in Rojava
Public security member killed in Serêkaniyê laid to rest
Two suicide attacks in Serêkaniyê
Serêkaniyê bids farewell to fighters killed in attack

BDP demands investigation into extra-judicial killing
Kurdish political prisoner in critical conditions
UN: Civilians in Syria needs urgent aid


IT´S THE NABKA-1948-ARMENIAN-SADDAM-CIA-ISRAELI-UK-US-TURKISH-STYLISH GENOCIDES ALL OVER THE #¤#¤¤ REGION AND BEYOND! THE ONLY PLACE THAT IS NOT BOMBED AND ATTACKED FOR THE MOMENT IS NORTH KURDISTAN!

"Israeli psychopaths launch air strikes on Gaza as Fatah and Hamas sign reconciliation deal.".."It´s the only democracy in the region defending itself." ..as "Persians like Cyrus the Great cannot be trusted"..

GAZA CITY (Ma'an) -- PLO and Hamas representatives announced an historic unity deal on Wednesday to bring to an end more than seven years of political division between the main Palestinian political parties. Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh announced the end of years of Palestinian political division in a press conference in Gaza City, saying that the Hamas and PLO delegations had worked as "one team" throughout the reconciliation dialogue and had stressed the necessity of achieving results in this round of dialogue. 

The joint PLO-Hamas statement given at the conference also authorized the Palestinian Authority president to set a date for new elections, and emphasized the commitment of both sides to the reconciliation principles that had been agreed upon in the Cairo Agreement and the Doha Declaration.

They also emphasized the need to reactivate the Palestinian Legislative Council.

Earlier, Palestinian officials announced that they had agreed to form a unity government within five weeks that will be headed by either President Mahmoud Abbas or former Deputy Prime Minister of the 2006 unity government Nasser al-Din al-Shaer, who is a member of Hamas.

The parties also agreed that both Hamas in Gaza and Fatah in the occupied West Bank would release prisoners detained for their political affiliation.

The division between the two Palestinian factions began in 2006, when Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections.

In the following year, clashes erupted between Fatah and Hamas, leaving Hamas in control of the Strip and Fatah in control of parts of the occupied West Bank.

The groups have made failed attempts at national reconciliation for years, most recently in 2012, when they signed two agreements -- one in Cairo and a subsequent one in Doha -- which have as of yet been entirely unimplemented.

Fatah leader Azzam al-Ahmad said that neither side will accept the resumption of negotiations with Israel without clear guidelines, and that negotiations had stalled as a result of "Israel intransigence" and "American bias."

http://www.maannews.net/eng/Default.aspx

Reuters: Israel bombs Gaza target, four wounded: medical officials Two Palestinians injured in an Israeli drone's targeting of a motorcycle in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza Strip.

PLO, Hamas announce agreement to end political division
Palestinian leaders 'agree to form national unity govt'
Israel launches airstrike in Gaza, just after unity negotiations announced
Israel attacks Gaza after Palestinian factions announce unity pact
Hamas, PLO begin 2nd day of reconciliation talks in Gaza

Israeli forces launch air strike on Gaza
Occupation Gunboats Open Fire at Palestinian fishing boats
7 injured in Israeli airstrike on northern Gaza Strip
12 Gazans injured, including two seriously, by Israeli drone missile
Israeli airstrikes target central Gaza Strip

Israeli troops shower Bethlehem-area village with tear gas
Dozens hurt from tear gas as Israeli forces raid Nablus village

Elena Kagan and US Supreme Court takes up status of Jerusalem

Iran Protests at UN Committee on Envoy Ban as US Stands Ground

Official: Yarmouk residents to protest against militant groups
Over 1,000 protest 'price tag' attacks in Umm al-Fahm
Exhibition opening in Ramallah, Palestine featuring works of 40 artists from Gaza

Bomb attack in Cairo wounds 2 police, civilian
Uniformed Gunmen Attack Polling Center in Iraq; 29 Killed, 61 Wounded
Militants Attack Balloting Center in Iraq, Kill 10
Red Cross 'Appalled' by Rising Violence in Syria's Aleppo

US-Israeli Reporter Held by Protesters in East Ukraine
US Sending 600 Ground Troops to Eastern Europe

US Drones Killed Scores, Now Yemen Scrambles to ID 'Suspects'
'Piles and Piles' of Bodies in South Sudan Slaughter

The Bad Guys - Zbigniew Brzezinski

IRAN-RESIST.ORG - Britian, The USA, Kissinger, Bilderberg, the Brzezinski doctrine and the so called "Green Belt" agenda.

IRAN-RESIST.ORG – September 22, 2009. The President of the Mullahs is awaited in New York in view of his speech on peace and respect between nations at the General Assembly of the United Nations. Washington was hoping that Ahmadinejad would profit from this opportunity and resume direct talks with them, but Tehran refused. In riposte the U.S. pulled out its usual menaces : A possible Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities and the threat of further sanctions. Washington however to a further step towards appeasement made the incredible vow of “shooting down any Israeli aircraft using Iraqi airspace to attack Iran.” 

This promise came from Zbigniew Brzezinski, a super Czar of the American diplomacy, and personal advisor to Obama, a man extremely well listened in Iran. This announcement has nothing to do with Israel but with Brzezinski’s doctrine on Central Asia followed for the past 33 years by all the American Presidents.

We have been listening to the same American music for the past six years. The U.S. does not wish to overthrow the Mullahs, but to scare them into accepting an entente that would open the door to Central Asia via Iran to them. This region highly interests the U.S. for it has a vital role on Chinese and Russian economies.

Central Asia is an enclave without any access to any major sea or ocean. In order to deliver their precious resources to the West, Central Asian countries need to transit through neighbouring countries: Russia, China, Iran and Afghanistan. 

In this group of nations, Afghanistan is a lame duck, for it is itself an enclave but mostly prone to incessant civil war. If it were a more stable country it could become a corridor to the Indian Ocean through American allied Pakistan. However, the high stakes around the control of Afghanistan leads Russia and China in supporting the Talibans (via the aid of the Mullahs) in order to deprive the U.S. from the control of the country. 

Thus, China and Russia share the natural gas resources of Central Asia, China for its industrial needs and Russia by selling them with high margin to Europe. If the U.S. were to access Central Asia, they would not only slow down China’s economic development but also deprive Russia of an important source of revenue. Therefore, the only stable option left to Washington is an entente with Iran, the third corridor between Central Asia and the Indian Ocean through the Persian Gulf.

The complexity of the situation is not that the U.S. just wants a simple corridor, for it has the means to help the Iranian people to overthrow the Mullahs and in exchange get access to Iran for its trading purposes. Washington also wishes to have the Mullahs as regional allies. The heirs of Khomeini are venerated by Muslims around the globe for their anti-Zionist stands, and could encourage the Muslims of the Western Chinese region of Xian Jiang to move towards independence from China and deprive Beijing of a region rich in natural resources. Washington could give a fatal blow to its new economic rival China.

The hidden Iranian agenda. In exchange for an entente with the U.S. that would eliminate the Sino-Russian adversity, Tehran wants the abandon of sanctions and American demands of demilitarization of the Hezbollah. For the past three years the Hezbollah has been engaged in a military war with Israel. This conflict has greatly troubled the U.S. allied Arab nations, for they are being accused of complacency towards Israel by the Arab opinion. The Hezbollah is therefore an indispensable arm for the Mullahs allowing them to put pressure on the U.S. and its allies when needed. The Hezbollah is a warranty clause in their entente negotiations with Washington. Their survival depends upon it.

The Iranian demands are obviously incompatible with American interests. Washington therefore deploys its threats of sanctions and military strikes in order to push the Mullahs in lowering their pretentions. The threats do scare the Mullahs, for they are aware of their unpopularity with the Iranian people and know that a strike or harsh economic sanctions would irremediably lead to an uprising and their downfall. 

It is exactly because this risk exists that Washington refuses to carry on its threats for the Mullahs would be an extremely valuable pawn if an entente was reached. Despite the fact that the Mullahs are aware of their interest for the American agenda, they do not know how long the U.S. patience would last, for the control of Central Asia is becoming urgent. Washington is using the Mullahs doubt in their intimidation strategy.

The architecture of credible threats.

In the Bush era, the threats were credible but fictive, in the form of either American or Israeli rumours, never denied. This strategy was stamped “the drumbeats of conflict” by the American Admiral Fallon before he resigned. The threats ended up being useless for Tehran used them as a pretext alongside the Western demand it suspend its nuclear enrichment program in order to snob any dialogue. 

Obama has slightly changed his strategy by renouncing on any preliminary conditions to engage a dialogue with Tehran, the threats being left to Israeli lower hierarchal officials, and quickly denied by the American State Department to avoid giving excuses to Tehran to snob the dialogue. To put an end to the Bush Administration’s counterproductive aggressive attitude, the U.S. has changed their credible threat strategy radically.

In this new strategy after an Israeli threat, we got an official American denial of Israeli strikes, followed by a denial from an Israeli high official on the absence of certitude in this domain, and last an article in the Jerusalem Post citing an anonymous high ranked American official affirming that in case of a non concerted Israeli attack on Iran Washington would “shoot down Israeli aircrafts overflying Iraq.” The Post, an accomplice in the rumour, then makes the precision that the author of the above information “does not have a decisional position in the Obama administration.” However, we know the contrary for the author of this affirmation is non other but Zbigniew Brzezinski, the author of the principal strategic doctrine carried out in the Middle East by Washington for the past 33 years. 

Brzezinski is the hidden chief of American diplomacy for he past 33 years, he also has a foot in the Obama administration through one of his closest lieutenants Robert Gates, who already served in the Bush administration. Without being officially a representative of the U.S. government, Brzezinski was used as an alternative to flatter the Mullahs and try to obtain a concession on the Hezbollah issue.

With this latest version of the credible rumour strategy we have reached a new limit of virtuosity but also of absurdity to reach an impossible entente with the Mullahs. It is not surprising to see Brzezinski hold a role in this comedy for he is after all its author. 

The actual American policy regarding Iran is a failure, for it is a renewed version of Brzezinski’s old doctrine of the green belt that has also failed in the instrumentation of radical Islam with the objective of agitating the Muslim regions of Communist USSR and China and lead them to their demise. Brzezinski first initiated his doctrine in 1977 in Pakistan with an Islamic coup against the progressive Bhutto, followed in 78 in Iran and 79 in Afghanistan. 

In Iran he proposed the idea of an Islamic revolution to topple the Shah, who’s preference for a secular system, his industrialization projects and his refusal to reconduct the petrol agreement with a multinational consortium composed of American, British and French oil companies in 1979.

But Brzezinski broke an established order in the region and his doctrine did not achieve the results hoped for. In Afghanistan the U.S. lost the control of the Taliban monster it had created. And in Iran, the Mullahs who were not initially destined to holding on power, kept it by sweeping aside the pro-American Islamo-Nationalist Iranians.

Despite the failures, Brzezinski has remained influential, for he was one of the first to predict in the 1970’s the extraordinary Chinese economic leap and to imagine a manner of preventing it. But today China has become an economic giant and Washington is still applying Brzezinski’s preventive doctrine imagining that the control of Central Asia would push China to attack Russia to take over Siberia’s resources : the two former Communist nations confronting each other for the pure pleasure of Washington.

Meanwhile, whilst the Brzezinski doctrine has remained unchanged despite a few modifications after repeated failures, the Russians who in the past because of an anti-Chinese jealousy had delayed the construction of a Siberia-China pipeline, signed the construction of one in 2008, making it operational in 2010. Time has come to throw away this defective doctrine that has proven ineffective in its Iranian objectives since 1979 and is outdated in its Sino-Russian chapter.

It will be an even greater feat than an entente with the Mullahs to abandon this doctrine, for Brzezinski has over the years weaved a large web of researchers and politicians, like Gates and Obama , who owe their careers to him, and fear that by admitting that the doctrine is faulty they would lose their advantages.

A change would not only be salutary for the region but also for the United States, for like all great empires, the American weak point is in the heart of its power. Meanwhile, we will witness other examples of the Obama administration’s absurdity with ephemeral but credible threats. A greater and greater absurdity as an entente with the Mullahs will become less and less probable by following the Brzezinski doctrine.

http://www.iran-resist.org